Citation
J. Hamrick, T. L. Griffiths. "What to Simulate? Inferring the Right Direction for Mental Rotation". Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2014.

Abstract
When people use mental imagery, how do they decide which images to generate? To answer this question, we explored how mental simulation should be used in the classic psychological task of determining if two images depict the same object in different orientations (Shepard & Metzler, 1971). Through a rational analysis of mental rotation, we formalized four models and compared them to human performance. We found that three models based on previous hypotheses in the literature were unable to account for several aspects of human behavior. The fourth is based on the idea active sampling (e.g., Gureckis & Markant, 2012), which is a strategy of choosing actions that will provide the most information. This last model provides a plausible account of how people use mental rotation, where the other models do not. Based on these results, we suggest that the question of “what to simulate?” is more difficult than has previously been assumed, and that an active learning approach holds promise for uncovering the answer.

Electronic downloads

• http://cocosci.berkeley.edu/jess/WhatToSimulate.pdf

• HTML

  J. Hamrick, T. L. Griffiths. <a
  href="http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/pubs/12.html"
  >What to Simulate? Inferring the Right Direction for
  Mental Rotation</a>, Annual Conference of the
  Cognitive Science Society, 2014.

• Plain text

  J. Hamrick, T. L. Griffiths. "What to Simulate?
  Inferring the Right Direction for Mental Rotation".
  Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2014.

• BibTeX

  @inproceedings{HamrickGriffiths14_WhatToSimulateInferringRightDirectionForMentalRotation,
      author = {J. Hamrick and T. L. Griffiths},
      title = {What to Simulate? Inferring the Right Direction
                for Mental Rotation},
      booktitle = {Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
      year = {2014},
      abstract = {When people use mental imagery, how do they decide
                which images to generate? To answer this question,
                we explored how mental simulation should be used
                in the classic psychological task of determining
                if two images depict the same object in different
                orientations (Shepard \& Metzler, 1971). Through a
                rational analysis of mental rotation, we
                formalized four models and compared them to human
                performance. We found that three models based on
                previous hypotheses in the literature were unable
                to account for several aspects of human behavior.
                The fourth is based on the idea active sampling
                (e.g., Gureckis \& Markant, 2012), which is a
                strategy of choosing actions that will provide the
                most information. This last model provides a
                plausible account of how people use mental
                rotation, where the other models do not. Based on
                these results, we suggest that the question of
                �what to simulate?� is more difficult than has
                previously been assumed, and that an active
                learning approach holds promise for uncovering the
                answer.},
      URL = {http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/pubs/12.html}
  }
  

Posted by Ehsan Elhamifar on 30 May 2014.
Groups: ehumans
For additional information, see the Publications FAQ or contact webmaster at robotics eecs berkeley edu.