Team for Research in
Ubiquitous Secure Technology

User Choices and Regret: Understanding Users' Decision Process about Consensually acquired Spyware
Nathaniel Good, Jens Grossklags, David Thaw, Aaron Perzanowski, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Joseph Konstan

Citation
Nathaniel Good, Jens Grossklags, David Thaw, Aaron Perzanowski, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Joseph Konstan. "User Choices and Regret: Understanding Users' Decision Process about Consensually acquired Spyware". I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 2(2), January 2006.

Abstract
Spyware is software which monitors user actions, gathers personal data, and/or displays advertisements to users. While some spyware is installed surreptitiously, a surprising amount is installed on users' computers with their active participation. In some cases, users agree to accept spyware as part of a software bundle as a cost associated with gaining functionality they desire. In many other cases, however, users were unaware that they installed spyware, or of the consequences of that installation. This lack of awareness occurs even when the functioning of the spyware is explicitly declared in the end user license agreement (EULA). We demonstrate and argue that interface design can be a significant factor in eliciting informed consent and in supporting users in actively managing their own computer environments. This paper reviews the legal, technical, and design issues related to spyware and its installation. It reports on results of an experiment in which 31 users were asked to configure computers, deciding which software to install from a set of software that included disclosed spyware. The results suggest that current EULA interfaces do little to encourage informed decision-making and that simpler interfaces with key terms highlighted have potential to improve informed decision-making.

Electronic downloads

Citation formats  
  • HTML
    Nathaniel Good,  Jens Grossklags, David Thaw,  Aaron
    Perzanowski, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Joseph Konstan. <a
    href="http://www.truststc.org/pubs/61.html"
    >User Choices and Regret: Understanding Users' Decision
    Process about Consensually acquired Spyware</a>,
    <i>I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the
    Information Society</i>, 2(2), January 2006.
  • Plain text
    Nathaniel Good,  Jens Grossklags, David Thaw,  Aaron
    Perzanowski, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Joseph Konstan. "User
    Choices and Regret: Understanding Users' Decision Process
    about Consensually acquired Spyware". <i>I/S: A
    Journal of Law and Policy for the Information
    Society</i>, 2(2), January 2006.
  • BibTeX
    @article{GoodGrossklagsThawPerzanowskiMulliganKonstan06_UserChoicesRegretUnderstandingUsersDecisionProcess,
        author = {Nathaniel Good,  Jens Grossklags, David Thaw, 
                  Aaron Perzanowski, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Joseph
                  Konstan},
        title = {User Choices and Regret: Understanding Users'
                  Decision Process about Consensually acquired
                  Spyware},
        journal = {I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the
                  Information Society},
        volume = {2},
        number = {2},
        month = {January},
        year = {2006},
        abstract = {Spyware is software which monitors user actions,
                  gathers personal data, and/or displays
                  advertisements to users. While some spyware is
                  installed surreptitiously, a surprising amount is
                  installed on users' computers with their active
                  participation. In some cases, users agree to
                  accept spyware as part of a software bundle as a
                  cost associated with gaining functionality they
                  desire. In many other cases, however, users were
                  unaware that they installed spyware, or of the
                  consequences of that installation. This lack of
                  awareness occurs even when the functioning of the
                  spyware is explicitly declared in the end user
                  license agreement (EULA). We demonstrate and argue
                  that interface design can be a significant factor
                  in eliciting informed consent and in supporting
                  users in actively managing their own computer
                  environments. This paper reviews the legal,
                  technical, and design issues related to spyware
                  and its installation. It reports on results of an
                  experiment in which 31 users were asked to
                  configure computers, deciding which software to
                  install from a set of software that included
                  disclosed spyware. The results suggest that
                  current EULA interfaces do little to encourage
                  informed decision-making and that simpler
                  interfaces with key terms highlighted have
                  potential to improve informed decision-making. },
        URL = {http://www.truststc.org/pubs/61.html}
    }
    

Posted by Deirdre Mulligan on 17 Apr 2006.
For additional information, see the Publications FAQ or contact webmaster at www truststc org.

Notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright.