Team for Research in
Ubiquitous Secure Technology

Reasoning about Concrete Security in Protocol Proofs
Arnab Roy

Citation
Arnab Roy. "Reasoning about Concrete Security in Protocol Proofs". Talk or presentation, 30, November, 2009.

Abstract
Concrete security analysis of network protocols is a refinement of complexity theoretic analysis where the aim is to provide quantitative security guarantees instead of asymptotic ones. This provides valuable insight into answering such questions as how frequently should we refresh keys and what is the exact trade-off between security and efficiency given known methods to attack the cryptographic primitives. We are developing a logical framework which supports reasoning about concrete security. We demonstrate the system by proving concrete authentication guarantee of a signature based challenge response protocol. This is joint work with Anupam Datta, Joseph Y. Halpern, John C. Mitchell, and Riccardo Pucella.

Electronic downloads

Citation formats  
  • HTML
    Arnab Roy. <a
    href="http://www.truststc.org/pubs/644.html"
    ><i>Reasoning about Concrete Security in Protocol
    Proofs</i></a>, Talk or presentation,  30,
    November, 2009.
  • Plain text
    Arnab Roy. "Reasoning about Concrete Security in
    Protocol Proofs". Talk or presentation,  30, November,
    2009.
  • BibTeX
    @presentation{Roy09_ReasoningAboutConcreteSecurityInProtocolProofs,
        author = {Arnab Roy},
        title = {Reasoning about Concrete Security in Protocol
                  Proofs},
        day = {30},
        month = {November},
        year = {2009},
        abstract = {Concrete security analysis of network protocols is
                  a refinement of complexity theoretic analysis
                  where the aim is to provide quantitative security
                  guarantees instead of asymptotic ones. This
                  provides valuable insight into answering such
                  questions as how frequently should we refresh keys
                  and what is the exact trade-off between security
                  and efficiency given known methods to attack the
                  cryptographic primitives. We are developing a
                  logical framework which supports reasoning about
                  concrete security. We demonstrate the system by
                  proving concrete authentication guarantee of a
                  signature based challenge response protocol. This
                  is joint work with Anupam Datta, Joseph Y.
                  Halpern, John C. Mitchell, and Riccardo Pucella.},
        URL = {http://www.truststc.org/pubs/644.html}
    }
    

Posted by Larry Rohrbough on 5 Nov 2009.
For additional information, see the Publications FAQ or contact webmaster at www truststc org.

Notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright.